162 posts categorized "Weblogs"

Jun 09, 2009

Pure Michigan Campaign is Pure Magic from Someone who Knows

Pure Michigan Campaign is Pure Magic

Maple_leafI'm not very sentimental. I don't save old ticket stubs or dried-up remnants of bouquets. But simple evocative writing gets me, every time. Kudos to the folks at McCann Erickson for developing a truly greatPure Michigan campaign. No, it's not the pretty images on the TV spots. It's the voice over by Tim Allen and lyrical copy that make you want to drive to Michigan RIGHT NOW and experience apple picking and antiquing and "the slow dance of turning leaves." In the Nature's Show radio spot, the copy reminds us that we could just stay home and see a movie or watch TV, but the beauty of fall's turning leaves are something we will remember for the rest of our lives.  Well said. Listen/watch the spots here.

Via

ZuD: For me it's the best Ad Campaign yet. Tim Allen's voice, the motion photography, the haunting melody. Makes me want to jump in my car and do a Road Trip! And I've seen it all for the last fifty some years, I live in the bloody state. 

May 11, 2009

With Twitter, As Followers Increase, So Should Clicks, Not Necessarily

I am perplexed, so I am putting this up in a post to request that the Mavens of Twitter solve this conundrum for me. The following two graphs chart the growth in Followers and Clicks via the two databases:

HootSuite

TwitterCounter As you can see the growth has been steady in Followers but Clicks are not exponentially increasing. It had been my thought that as followers grew, so would the clicks of the links! This is not the case however, and I don't think the quality of links has fallen off, though they may have. If anyone has any thoughts on this dilemma please share them in the comments or tweet me: @ZuDfunck

Apr 23, 2009

Is there a name for someone who constantly moves their furniture around?

Apr 22, 2009

What Kind of Twit are You?

I don't know what it is you are doing there
I can tell you what I am Up to though
I just feel like it is an open Mike
Kind of thing
Where I walk on up and say a bit
Play a bit
Just run some stream of consciousness on folks
Its a forum
It's not an university class
There aren't any credits
There aren't any cops
It's just plain folks getting together
To share a little Fun.

I may put quotes from movies
Put a link to a story in the Times
Point you to a link that shows a good video
I have good taste and I get pissed
when they don't go over to check it out!
But that's the game
If the tweet is interesting
If they're curious they'll click it!

Apr 21, 2009

ZuDfunck's Perfect Twitter App: A Unibody MacBook

So I just downloaded A Twitter Client on my MacBook
And then it occurred to me
I don't need this Sh#t
My MacBook is my Twitter client!

Maybe folks who have big time work machines
With all the applications firing need a little cubby
That they can say is for Twitter

I am not so confined I have a 2.4 GHz MacBook
Devoted to the Twitter thang
Mostly a Firefox browser with some 8 tabs
Holding stuff I found from my RSS reader
Waiting an appropriate time to throw up from
My Hootsuite interface
Then monitor with my Twazzup search set to @ZuDfunck
As well as the Twitter homepage on another Tab.

Am I wrong or isn't that the perfect Twitter App?

So folks stop trying to sell me on the perfect Twitter App
For the Mac
The Mac is The Perfect Twitter App!

I would relish your comments
As I feel that is All
Unless you have something to say!

Apr 20, 2009

How Do You Use Twitter?

A digital Artist
Ultimately that's what I am
Text, Video, Audio
It's all been done by ZuD.

I think it's seasonal
Whether he'll Vlog - Podcast - or Blog
A whim - No more or less.

The weather was severe in Michigan this past Winter
Forced the boy indoors
Said what of your pursuit ZuD?
The lens will freeze.

Bump into a dude we know
Straight out asked
What do you know about Twitter
How do you use it?

I use it to deliver my posts from my blog
Oh that's a SIn
That's not using it right!

So I want to do it right - Right?
And I've been trying to do it right
Since he asked me
How do you use Twitter?

Apr 16, 2009

Why ZuDfunck Can't Come Out To Blog

Sometimes there are exactly 2 pieces of bread
Left to make a sandwich
And the bread is a bit stale
And it’s a labored effort to ignore

That’s how I feel about Blogging
It’s labored
A little Stale
But I want my Sandwich

I get hungry to share something
A Pic, A Look, a Joke
Just to know I put it out there

There’s the Digital Crack, sure
But the creative push
Is just as dominant as an ogre

You think you know
What your dealing with
Well?

Mar 24, 2009

ZuDfunck Migrates To Twitter

Hear Ye!, Hear Ye!, Hear Ye!

The micro blogging reality that is Twitter has taken out another Blogger!
We can no longer deny the death of Blogging
Under that stress and dismal fact
We are forced to move our operations
Lock Stock and Barrel
Great film! Actually:
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels
To a more stringently structured location.
But man on man it is jumping!
There are followers galore
ReTweets by the Dozens
If you don't know what I am saying
Then you don't know what is Happening
Why am I writing this way
I am practicing my Micro Speak
This is how they Write
Little bursts of Text
Tweets of Wisdom
Blurbs of Text
Tweets

Good lord
Who thought ZuD would end up at Twitter
Not me
I thought we could Survive
But the Tide is Changing
And go with It
We Will
Tweet
Tweet
ZuD is a Twit
@ZuDfunck

Mar 16, 2009

Your Online Presence Circumvents Reinventing Yourself

When you've documented everything online, how do you rediscover yourself as someone different, as you go through life? This young lady asks that Profound Question:

Online social networks are so new that it’s impossible to know their long-term impact. There’s some evidence that college students have mixed feelings about being guinea pigs for the faux-friendship age. One student interviewed for a study of why and how college students use Facebook, which was published last year in The Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, admitted that being privy to the personal details of “friends” who she had not seen in years made her uncomfortable. “Someone from earlier in her life had broken up with a boyfriend,” an author of the article, Sandra L. Calvert, a professor and chairwoman of the psychology department at Georgetown University, told me. “She felt she knew all these intimate details about this person, yet they hadn’t actually been in touch for five years.” On the other hand, a study published in 2007 in The Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication suggested that hanging onto old friends via Facebook may alleviate feelings of isolation for students whose transition to campus life had proved rocky. Evidently they took comfort in knowing that “Dylan is drinking Peets.”

That may well be, but something is drowned in that virtual coffee cup — an opportunity for insight, for growth through loneliness. Perhaps my nieces will find a new way to establish distance from their former selves, to clear space for introspection and transformation. Perhaps they will evolve through judicious deleting and updating of profile information, through the constant awareness of their public face. Maybe the Greek chorus of preschool buddies will be more anchor than albatross, giving them strength to take risks or to stick out tough times. It could be that my generation was the anomalous one, that Facebook marks a return to the time when people remained embedded in their communities for life, with connections that ran deep, peers who reined them in if they strayed too far from the norm, parents who expected them to live at home until marriage (adult children are already reclaiming their childhood rooms in droves). More likely, though, the very thing that attracts us oldsters to Facebook — the lure of auld lang syne — will be its undoing. Kids, who will inevitably want to drive a stake into the heart of former lives, may simply abandon the service (remember Friendster?) and find something new: something still unformed, yet to be invented — much like themselves. Full Article

Peggy Orenstein, a contributing writer, is the author of the memoir “Waiting for Daisy.”

Mar 15, 2009

Which Is More Responsive: Facebook, FriendFeed or Twitter?

This Dude does some interesting Analysis of a Text Message he sent out on FB, FF & Twitter:

What did I do?!

I posted an identically-phrased note on Facebook, Friendfeed, and Twitter  at around 1:30am PDT Friday morning.  Specifically, I posted this: “Could you kindly help me with a super-quick experiment (takes less than 30 seconds)? I’ll share results smile Thanks!”

Why?

I was curious to see which set of friends/subscribers (henceforth referred to as “contacts”) would be more apt to read my note and reply.

What happened?

As of nearly 40 hours after posting…

Mar 13, 2009

It's The WorldWideWeb's Birthday, Happy 20th WWW!

I didn't get a card or cake, maybe this post can suffice

On March 13th, 2009 the World Wide Web will turn 20 years old. Sir Tim Berners-Lee invented this world-changing layer on top of the Internet on this day in 1989. It's hard to overstate the impact this young technology has had already and it's even more exciting to think about where it's going in the future.

Berners-Lee has some great ideas about where the web should go next. His vision is of a major advance that could serve as the foundation for innovations that we can't even imagine today.

One year ago Berners-Lee said that all the pieces needed to build a new Semantic Web are now in place. Last month he gave an impassioned talk at the high-profile TED conference about a related concept called Linked Data, a set of ideas he outlined in 2006. The gist of the idea is that we need every institution that can do so putting raw data in standardized format up on the web.

What's so exciting about raw data? We'll defer to Berners-Lee's 15 minute explanation at this year's TED conference. The video of his talk will be posted on the TED website early Friday morning, but ReadWriteWeb readers can check it out now.

Thank you Tim, for what you've done for the world already.


Mar 12, 2009

Stephen Fry Weighs In at Quarter Million Followers on Twitter

I don't know this dude, but apparently a lot of people do. He has a quarter million followers! So I dug a little and found this lovely banner image and this great post:

Stephenfry

Retweet

Monday, March 2nd, 2009

Hello there.

You have either asked me to retweet a post or to draw the attention of my followers to a particular site. It is quite probable that you want to alert as many people as possible to a worthy cause, an extraordinary person or perhaps a landmark day or event that should be celebrated and recognised by as many people as can be reached. It is just as probable that I heartily approve of your cause and its aims. And yet I am sending you here to this page on my website instead of complying with your simple and reasonable request. What on earth am I playing at? How can I be so uncharitable, so unfeeling? With a quarter of a million followers isn’t it my duty to use my captive twitter audience for good and noble ends?

Well yes. But try and understand how difficult it is to comply with your wishes for a number of reasons.

If I direct followers’ attention to one site on request, then don’t I have to for all?

Suppose I miss a particular request, suppose I just don’t see it stream past me?

Suppose one such ‘charity’ is revealed to be rather more self-interested and less charitable than I had supposed, not unlike certain appeals for sponsorship that have turned out to be little short of attempts to get money for a nice long holiday for some enterprising scamster? How can I have time to check out the dozens and dozens of sites a day? And yet, if I don’t, how can I be confident that I am not leading my followers astray and giving the oxygen of publicity to frauds?

Most worryingly of all, how can I guarantee that your site is robust enough take the sudden burst of traffic that a retweet from me will inevitably cause? I have to be realistic about this. It isn’t vanity or braggadocio, but simply a melancholy facing of the fact that when I tweet a site that site will get inevitably get stormed, stampeded and smashed into collapse. It has happened too often for me to doubt it, and after webmasters have sworn blind to me that their servers and hosts can easily shoulder the burden. It has happened to highly capitalised major servers that one really might have expected to be structurally sounder. The power of Twitter is only just being understood. The last thing I would want is to be responsible for slash-dotting worthy, important and useful services. Continued

Mar 11, 2009

It's The End of The Blog As We Know It

And I am not sure what it will become, but with all the micro blogging going on it surely won't be like it was. This dude has some powerful words that I snippet here but encourage you to read the whole article:

Blogging is entrenched in the mainstream. Indeed, consumers, businesses, content publishers, and media channels are embracing blogs as a way of engaging existing and reaching new readers to build an ecosystem around relevant conversations. It’s the convergence of dialog and journalism, creating a new generation of interconnectedness between publisher and community.

So why do I believe that blog authority is losing its authority?

It goes back to the definition of authority. Links from blogs are no longer the only measurable game in town. Potentially valuable linkbacks are increasingly shared in micro communities and social networks such as Twitter, Facebook, and FriendFeed and they are detouring attention and time away from formal blog responses.

As the social Web and new services continue the migration and permeation into everything we do online, attention is not scalable. Many refer to this dilemma as attention scarcity or continuous partial attention (CPA) - an increasingly thinning state of focus. It’s affecting how and what we consume, when, and more importantly, how we react, participate and share. That something is forever vying for our attention and relentlessly pushing us to do more with less driven by the omnipresent fear of potentially missing what’s next.

We are learning to publish and react to content in “Twitter time” and I’d argue that many of us are spending less time blogging, commenting directly on blogs, or writing blogs in response to blog sources because of our active participation in micro communities.

With the popularity and pervasiveness of microblogging (a.k.a. micromedia) and activity streams and timelines, Twitter, Facebook, FriendFeed and the like are competing for your attention and building a community around the statusphere - the state of publishing, reading, responding to, and sharing micro-sized updates.

This new genre of rapid-fire interaction is further distributing the proverbial conversation and is evolving online interaction beyond the host site through syndication to other relevant networks and communities.

In most cases attention for commenters at the source post are competing against the commenters within other communities. Those who might typically respond with a formal blog post may now choose to respond with a tweet or a status update.

Attention is engaged at the point of introduction, and for many of us, we’re presented with worthwhile content outside of our RSS readers or favorite bookmarks. Relevant and noteworthy updates are now curated by our peers and trusted or respected contacts in disparate communities that change based on our daily click paths.

Retweets (RT) and favorites in Twitter, Likes and comments in FriendFeed and Facebook, posting shortened links that connect friends and followers back to the source post, have changed our behavior and empowered our role in defining the evolution of the connectivity and dissemination of information.

Now, we have the ability to instantly interact with, respond, or promote blog content away from the source blog, but that shouldn’t make the original post any less valuable. In fact, while blog authority isn’t capitalizing on these new sources for linkbacks, link authority is still affected, no matter the source, and helps increase the visibility and weight of the host blog in search engines.

The immediacy of publishing, sparking dialog, and receiving responses only reinforces this behavior. And, it encourages participation without having to write a blog post tracking back to the originator of each discussion. So, posts are missing out on a trove of valuable linklove from other blogs that would otherwise have contributed to their authority.

Continued

Mar 10, 2009

Van Morrison Plays A NYC JukeBox

I love the New Yorker, my parents always subscribed, I admit the cartoons were my major focus. Van Morrison was in NYC last week and the New Yorker did a piece on him:

Drive-by Dept.

Listening Party
Van Morrison

Van Morrison

Lakeside Lounge, on Avenue B, is known for many things: close quarters, cheap drinks, a photo booth, but most of all for its jukebox, which is full of raw R. & B., country, and early rock and roll. Last Monday afternoon, a short man in his sixties wearing oversized sunglasses and a black fedora cocked his ear toward the speaker overhead. “Joe Turner,” he said. “Big Joe.”

The song was “Honey Hush,” a No. 1 R. & B. hit in 1953 for the Kansas City blues shouter. The man was Van Morrison, the Irish singer and songwriter, who was in town to play a pair of shows that week at the WaMu Theatre, at Madison Square Garden. The concerts were recitals of an old record, the 1968 album “Astral Weeks.” But Morrison wanted to talk about even older records. “There was a place in Belfast called Atlantic Records,” he said, his accent strong, his speaking voice lighter than his singing voice. “They imported the stuff from here, actually: jazz records and blues records. I’d go with my father from when I was three.”

Joe Turner had stopped coming out of the jukebox. Now it was the founding fathers of rock and roll, in quick succession: Jerry Lee Lewis singing “Sixty Minute Man,” Chuck Berry with “Tulane,” Bo Diddley’s “Dearest Darling,” Little Richard on “Rip It Up.” Morrison acknowledged each song with a nod. He looked slimmer than he has in the past, and he had long red hair of a hue reminiscent of Sumner Redstone. He sipped tea from a mug, and his press agent brought him a bagel with tuna salad. “The first Little Richard song I heard was ‘Tutti Frutti,’ ” he said. “No, it was the one from the movie ‘The Girl Can’t Help It.’ Little Richard was doing rhythm and blues, but with horns,” Morrison went on. “It was different than Elvis Presley, and so I preferred it. Why would you like Elvis if you had the real stuff? I also preferred Carl Perkins and Gene Vincent. Vincent was different. He was rock and roll, dangerous.”

Morrison mentioned Wynonie Harris, the ribald singer of the late forties and early fifties known as Mr. Blues: “I heard one of his on the radio, on a daytime show. Someone probably played it by accident.” He held forth on Leadbelly: “He did everything from children’s songs to cowboy songs to show tunes.” He talked about the blind harpist Sonny Terry (the first record he ever bought was one of Terry’s), the powerhouse vocalist Bobby Bland, and the skiffle pioneer Lonnie Donegan. When someone grouped Donegan with other practitioners of “pre-Beatles rock and roll,” Morrison pulled up short.

“That’s a cliché,” he said, adjusting his sunglasses. “I don’t think ‘pre-Beatles’ means anything, because there was stuff before them. Over here, you have a different slant. You measure things in terms of the Beatles. We don’t think music started there. Rolling Stone magazine does, because it’s their mythology. The Beatles were peripheral. If you had more knowledge about music, it didn’t really mean anything. To me, it was meaningless.”

Continued


Mar 02, 2009

Evan Williams on Blogger and Blogging

This dude is like the GodFather of Blogging platforms. First with Blogger now with Twitter. I found his blog today and though it is neglected, the lead post begins with the snippet I quote here and hope you click on to see what his bullet points are. I have great respect for Evan Williams because he has done what we all think we should do, which is to build a structure then get out of the way and let it grow. I look forward to what Twitter will become but am firmly entrenched in blogging as well. They will coexist and grow beautifully. We, you and I, need to make sure we nourish that growth carefully and lovingly.
The snippet:

What Blogger Should Do

I was recently asked about the "death of blogging" for this article in The Economist. I didn't get back to the reporter in time, though, so my comments ended up, ironically, on his blog. (Conclusion: I don't believe blogging is dying, but...it's complicated. Like in most healthy ecosystems, new species are breeding. Whether or not they're called "blogging" is a question perhaps best left for scientists, but there are many new forms that are undeniably part of the blogging genus.)

Last night at the Churchill Club, I was quoted as saying that Twitter "will dwarf Blogger." I do believe that, but it will be no easy task and will not be soon. Blogger is big. Really big. That chart was from six months ago. Is it losing traction? I don't know. It doesn't look like it was then. And since then, the team over there seems to be kicking ass. A glance at Blogger Buzz show's they've been launching feature after feature the last few months. Launching any features when you're that big is usually a daunting task. Shows that a lot of years building a solid platform have paid off.

So, the question is: Where do they go from here? Part of that, I suppose, will be determined by where the Google powers-that-be decide Blogger lands on their priority list, given the leaner times. Clearly it's not one their cash cows, but it's also not a side project they're dabbling in. I've heard it makes money (from AdSense on blogs they host), but I really don't know. In fact, I know so little about Blogger these days, I feel like I can actually write about it as an outsider.

From a product perspective, I do feel like they could get more out of the capabilities and incredible usage they already have. Here's an unordered list of some of the ways I'd look to do that if I were in charge:

His Main Point

Feb 25, 2009

How To Be A Mensch

Hope this dude forgives me for Stealing the whole post but it is so good and I know how you ZuDDies are either too lazy or just won't click out of the main page. ZuDDies are the bastards of the internet!

But I digress once again. This post, yeah the post...

How to Be a Mensch

Istock 000000296073Small
I have a theory (as opposed to a dream) that Heaven is a three-class Boeing 777. You can sit in a narrow seat that doesn't recline and eat chicken-like substances next to a screaming baby in coach class. Or, you can sit in a slightly wider seat that reclines slightly more and eat a beef-like substance in business class.

But The Goal is to spend eternity in first class--specifically Singapore Airlines first class. Here your seat reclines to a completely flat position, and there's a power outlet, personal video player, wireless access to the Internet, and noise-cancelling headphones. There are also chefs, not microwave ovens.

You cannot buy your way into first class; nor can you use frequent flyer miles. The only way to earn an upgrade is to be a mensch. Leo Rosten, the Yiddish maven and author of The Joys of Yiddish, defines mensch this way:

Someone to admire and emulate, someone of noble character. The key to being “a real mensch” is nothing less than character, rectitude, dignity, a sense of what is right, responsible, decorous.

Here is my humble attempt to help you achieve menschdom.

  1. Help people who cannot help you. A mensch helps people who cannot ever return the favor. He doesn't care if the recipient is rich, famous, or powerful. This doesn't mean that you shouldn't help rich, famous, or powerful people (indeed, they may need the most help), but you shouldn't help only rich, famous, and powerful people.
  2. Help without the expectation of return. A mensch helps people without the expectation of return--at least in this life. What's the payoff? Not that there has to be a payoff, but the payoff is the pure satisfaction of helping others. Nothing more, nothing less.
  3. Help many people. Menschdom is a numbers game: you should help many people, so you don't hide your generosity under a bushel. (Of course, not even a mensch can help everyone. To try to do so would mean failing to help anyone.)
  4. Do the right thing the right way. A mensch always does the right thing the right way. She would never cop an attitude like, “We're not as bad as Enron.” There is a bright, clear line between right and wrong, and a mensch never crosses that line.
  5. Pay back society. A mensch realizes that he's blessed. For example, entrepreneurs are blessed with vision and passion plus the ability to recruit, raise money, and change the world. These blessings come with the obligation to pay back society. The baseline is that we owe something to society--we're not a doing a favor by paying back society.

Exercise: It's the end of your life. What three things do you want people to remember you for?
1.
2.
3.

If you'd like to read more about this subject, I suggest Joshua Halberstam's book called Everyday Ethics: Inspired Solutions to Real-Life Dilemmas.

I hope this helps you become a mensch. No need to thank me if it does--helping you is reward enough--ie, “Don't menschion it.”

Written at: Atherton, California.

Feb 24, 2009

Offensive NY Post Cartoon That's Causing A Stir

Nypost

Art & Beauty are truly in the eye of the beholder. I guess that would apply to political cartoons as well. Although I dislike what Murdoch has done to the media landscape I defend his right to tear it up! The one with the Gold makes the Rules.

Feb 19, 2009

Roger Ebert Remembers Gene Siskel Ten Years Hence

I thought these guys were the bomb when they first appeared. I learned about movies and what a real TV show felt like. The first of its' kind and now there are cable channels devoted to it. Glad I was there for the beginning of this phenomena and not the crap we have now:


Gene died ten years ago on February 20, 1999. He is in my mind almost every day. I don't want to rehearse the old stories about how we had a love/hate relationship, and how we dealt with television, and how we were both so scared the first time we went on Johnny Carson that, backstage, we couldn't think of the name of a single movie, although that story is absolutely true. Those stories have been told. I want to write about our friendship. The public image was that we were in a state of permanent feud, but nothing we felt had anything to do with image. We both knew the buttons to push on the other one, and we both made little effort to hide our feelings, warm or cold. In 1977 we were on a talk show with Buddy Rogers, once Mary Pickford's husband, and he said, "You guys have a sibling rivalry, but you both think you're the older brother."

Once Gene and I were involved in a joint appearance with another Chicago media couple, Steve Dahl and Garry Meier. It was a tribute to us or a tribute to them, I can't remember. They were pioneers of free-form radio. Gene and I were known for our rages against each other, and Steve and Garry were remarkable for their accord. They gave us advice about how to work together as a successful team. The reason I remember that is because soon afterward Steve and Garry had an angry public falling-out that has lasted until this day.

GeneTheaRoger.jpg

Gene, Thea Flaum and I during an early taping

Gene and I would never, ever, have had that happen to us. Unthinkable. In my darkest and moodiest hours, when all my competitiveness and resentment and indignation were at a roiling boil, I never considered it. I know Gene never did either. We were linked in a bond beyond all disputing. "You may be an asshole," Gene would say, "but you're my asshole." If we were fighting--get out of the room. But if we were teamed up against a common target, we were fatal. The first time we were on his show, Howard Stern never knew what hit him. He picked on one of us, and we were both at his throat.

We both thought of ourselves as full-service, one-stop film critics. We didn't see why the other one was quite necessary. We had been linked in a Faustian television format that brought us success at the price of autonomy. No sooner had I expressed a verdict on a movie, my verdict, than here came Siskel with the arrogance to say I was wrong, or, for that matter, the condescension to agree with me. It really felt like that. It was not an act. When we disagreed, there was incredulity; when we agreed, there was a kind of relief. In the television biz, they talk about "chemistry." Not a thought was given to our chemistry. We just had it, because from the day the Chicago Tribune made Gene its film critic, we were professional enemies. We never had a single meaningful conversation before we started to work on our TV program. Alone together in an elevator, we would study the numbers changing above the door.

Making this rivalry even worse was the tension of our early tapings. It would take eight hours to get one show in the can, with breaks for lunch, dinner and fights. I would break down, or he would break down, or one of us would do something different and throw the other off, or the accumulating angst would make our exchanges seem simply bizarre. There are many witnesses to the terror of those days. Only when we threw away our clipboards and 3x5 cards did we get anything done; we finally started ad-libbing and the show begin to work. We found we could tape a show in under an hour. Source

Feb 17, 2009

Facebook Users Upset With TOS, Get Graphic

Now I must say I am mulling over deleting Facebook because I just didn't have much success or the time, but others are expressing themselves very amusingly. This from a series of tumblr. posts here:


Huh

If Facebook thinks they can repackage my claim to have interest in “ninjas, epileptic chihuahuas, and silence” as a book, article, or film adaptation, they are more than welcome to try.

This should only be an issue for people who are uploading original photos and notes they’d like to see published at some point (“25 Things About Me”, Granta, Spring 2011)—in which case, UPLOAD THAT SHIT SOMEWHERE ELSE. And link to it if you must.

There. See? Not complicated.

Feb 15, 2009

Dick of 'Dick and Jane' Leaps To A Tragic Death

Sad how our school age heroes end up. 

Dick&jane

.


/



Twitter Remote


Twitter ZuDfunck


  • @zudVert

/


Bookmark and Share

FriendFeed


  • View my FriendFeed

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

ODDs & ENDs






Join ZuD @ Twitter


  • @zudVert
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 12/2003

Million Dollar Follow


Blog Widget by LinkWithin